Try
Harness is Tecco’s internal development control platform. Product maps, specifications, repository context and review gates make the work across App, Energy, Manager, Studio and Enterprise visible.
Purpose-built abstract views explain each capability. These are conceptual representations, not production interfaces or operational data.
Product capabilities are organised into functional groups with visible delivery states. The map connects small engineering changes to the larger resident experience.
Capability identifiers provide a stable reference across specifications and implementation discussions.
Generated conceptual artwork · not a product interface
The specification moves through initiation, design review, a contract and staged development gates. Each stage makes a different decision visible instead of treating code completion as product readiness.
A gate represents a decision with its own evidence requirements; a completed implementation alone is not release approval.
Generated conceptual artwork · not a product interface
Review tables record the checks associated with a specification. Applicability, ownership and evidence belong to the work itself rather than a separate narrative written after release.
Review connects scope, accountability and evidence. Internal specifications, owner records and implementation details remain inside the platform.
Generated conceptual artwork · not a product interfaceTecco’s internal development platform relates product capabilities to specifications, repository work and review gates. It makes dependencies visible across App, Energy, Manager, Studio and Enterprise.
| Boundary | Responsibility | Engineering consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Initiation and design | What is being built and why | Define scope, dependencies and a testable acceptance condition. |
| Contract and implementation | Where interfaces agree | Review the expected behaviour before integrating consumers. |
| Alpha, Beta and release | What evidence supports progression | Keep repository-specific QA and review decisions attached to the work. |
An agent can work more effectively when intent, constraints and acceptance criteria are explicit. Harness provides that development context. Automated implementation still needs observable outcomes and review: software release gates and a building’s commissioning state remain distinct lifecycles.
Product maps and shared dependencies give App, Energy, Manager, Studio and Enterprise work a common frame. Repository context sits alongside specifications and acceptance criteria.
Prototype review and contract gates make expectations explicit before Alpha, Beta and release. A stage name is a review boundary, not evidence that every feature has passed it.
Software release evidence and a building’s configuration state answer different questions. Harness supports the development lifecycle; commissioning and operational validation still need their own records.
Concept artworkCapture the meaning of a space before deciding how it should behave. Manager brings floor plans, rooms, device placement and design versions into a structured project workflow.
View details
Concept artworkStudio carries engineering context into configuration. Its SuperChart workbench connects the identity of a control object with the room, actuator and protocol information needed to implement it.
View details